standarddeviationcalculator.net

Updated Free · runs in your browser

Statistics

Confidence interval calculator

Enter a sample mean, its standard deviation and the sample size to get a confidence interval for the population mean. The calculation uses the t distribution, which is the correct choice when the population standard deviation is estimated from the sample.

95% confidence interval 23.8317 to 26.9683
Lower limit23.8317
Upper limit26.9683
Margin of error1.56831
Standard error0.766812
t* (df = 29)2.0452
Interval width3.13661
x̄ = 25.4 23.83 26.97

The curve is the sampling distribution of the mean; the bar beneath it spans the 95% interval. Repeat the sampling many times and about 95% of the intervals built this way would contain the true mean — it is not a 95% chance that this particular one does.

Show the working, step by step

The formula

CI = x̄ ± t* × (s / √n)

Read it in three pieces:

  • s / √n is the standard error — how much the sample mean itself would wobble from sample to sample.
  • t* is the critical value for your confidence level with n − 1 degrees of freedom. It sets how many standard errors wide the interval reaches.
  • x̄ ± centres the interval on your sample mean.

Critical t values

df (n − 1)90%95%99%
52.0152.5714.032
101.8122.2283.169
201.7252.0862.845
301.6972.0422.750
1001.6601.9842.626
∞ (z)1.6451.9602.576

Notice how sharply the values fall as df rises, and how much wider a 99% interval is than a 90% one. At df = 5 the 99% critical value is twice the 90% one — small samples pay heavily for extra confidence.

A worked example

A sample of 30 measurements has a mean of 25.4 and a standard deviation of 4.2, and you want a 95% interval.

  1. Standard error: 4.2 ÷ √30 = 4.2 ÷ 5.4772 = 0.7668.
  2. Critical value at 95% with df = 29: t* = 2.0452.
  3. Margin of error: 2.0452 × 0.7668 = 1.568.
  4. Interval: 25.4 ± 1.568 = 23.83 to 26.97.

Reported properly: "mean 25.4, 95% CI [23.83, 26.97]". The width of that interval is the honest statement of how much the estimate can be trusted — a point estimate on its own hides exactly that.

Reading intervals well

  • Width matters more than the point estimate. A mean of 25.4 with an interval of [25.1, 25.7] and one with [10, 41] are very different results, despite the identical centre.
  • Overlapping intervals do not settle a comparison. Two groups whose intervals overlap slightly can still differ significantly; test the difference directly rather than eyeballing the bars.
  • Check what an error bar represents. Published figures show SD, standard error or confidence intervals almost interchangeably, and they are wildly different widths. The caption should say; if it does not, be suspicious.
  • This interval is for the mean. To put a range around the spread instead, use the confidence interval for the standard deviation, which uses the chi-square distribution.
Confidence interval calculator: the worked example on this page, with its result and chart
Confidence interval calculator: the worked example above, at a glance.

Common questions

What does a 95% confidence interval actually mean?

It means that if you repeated the whole sampling procedure many times and built an interval this way each time, about 95% of those intervals would contain the true population mean.

It does not mean there is a 95% probability that the true mean lies inside the particular interval you calculated. That interval either contains it or it does not; the 95% describes the reliability of the method, not this one result.

Should I use t or z?

Use t when the population standard deviation is unknown and you are estimating it from the sample — which is nearly always. Use z only when σ is genuinely known in advance, which is rare outside textbook problems.

This calculator uses t. For large n the two converge: at n = 1000 the 95% t critical value is 1.9623 against z's 1.9600.

How do I make a confidence interval narrower?

Three levers, in order of usefulness. Increase n — the width shrinks with √n, so quadrupling the sample halves the interval. Reduce the underlying variability through better measurement or a more homogeneous group. Accept a lower confidence level — 90% gives a narrower interval than 95%, at the cost of being wrong more often.

What assumptions does this make?

That the data are a random sample of independent observations, and that either the underlying distribution is roughly normal or n is large enough for the central limit theorem to apply — conventionally n ≥ 30, though heavily skewed data needs more.